Who answers the wifi question at 11pm ?
Your guests get the code, the wifi and the right restaurant at 11pm. You get your evening back.
For your own business, or as a service you charge other businesses like yours for.
Nobody runs this lab yet. Take it, give it your hours and your prices, and it is yours.
Material, weight, dimensions, components, markets sold into. One row per packaging type, not per product.
Substances, marking, per-country registration, empty space. What blocks, what is missing, what to ask the supplier.
One declaration per packaging type, with the technical file behind it and the references it cites.
The answer to an authority holding a shipment, with what you send and what you commit to next.
The EU packaging regulation has applied since 12 August 2026, with no national transposition and no size exemption. Three obligations land on day one: a declaration of conformity per packaging type, backed by a technical file; substance restrictions, including the ban on PFAS in food contact; and registration with the extended producer responsibility scheme in every member state where you sell. Producer and importer marking becomes mandatory, and online selling adds the empty-space rule. A market surveillance authority can hold a shipment and ask for the documentation within ten days. That is the deadline that hurts when no file exists. A lab produces those documents from your pasted specifications.
Worth more in month six than in week one.
The collections belong to the lab, not to any single magik. Every magik reads them and every run adds to them, which is why this lab is worth more in month six than in week one.
They all start empty. The first run writes the first row.
It wears your name, not ours.
The same lab, under your name, your colours and your logo. Your customers never see ours.
On the Pro plan, and not needed to take a lab. A fully bespoke theme exists as an upgrade, hand built rather than self-serve.
And whatever you already use: any tool available through an API or an MCP server, connected with your own account.
A tool built for exactly your job, and only that, will go deeper at that one job. This is for the jobs nothing covers, or the ones spread across three tools today.
No. That is the peculiarity of this text and the reason it catches so many people out: it applies per type of packaging placed on the market, not per company size. A six-person brand owes the same declaration of conformity as a group, on every one of its packaging references.
Ask them to put it in writing, and look at what capacity they are acting in. Whoever places the packaging on the market under their own brand is not always whoever made it, and the declaration follows the obligation, not the purchase order. That is precisely the lab's first question: who is producer and who is importer on this reference.
Like a held shipment and a request for documentation within ten days. Ten days is short to write a technical file from nothing and plenty to fetch one already written. The whole difference sits there.
The ban in question covers food contact. The heavy metal limits do not stop at food. The lab does not guess your composition: it tells you which questions to put to your supplier, reference by reference, and flags the answers that are not answers.
No, and that is why a living file beats a one-off document. Harmonised marking arrives in 2028, reuse and recyclability in 2030. Every new packaging reference reopens the same work. A maintained file gets updated; a PDF written in a panic gets rewritten.
A tool built for exactly brands, online sellers and small packers with no quality department and no design office, and only that, will go deeper at that one job. This lab is for the jobs no tool covers, or the ones spread across three tools today, and it runs under your name.
Every audience is still open.
Nobody has taken a square on this idea yet. You declare your audience when you take the lab (“roofers in Brittany”, “plumbers around Paris”), and two people can start from the same idea on two different audiences without getting in each other’s way.
And it wears your name, not ours.
The bundle describes a lab that does not exist yet : the jobs it would do, and an example of each output.
Open Knowledge Format : plain markdown, re-importable into any agent. No account, no lock-in.
Your guests get the code, the wifi and the right restaurant at 11pm. You get your evening back.
Every review gets an answer, the welcome book is never out of date, and the seasonal staff stop coming to ask you.
Your site notes become the report: what was decided, who owes what, by when. Written before the next meeting.
Still comparing tools? Best AI for research.
| Reference | Material | Food contact | Sold in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 250 g carton | 300 gsm board + varnish | Yes | FR, BE, DE |
| Inner pouch | PE / metallised PET | Yes | FR, BE, DE |
| Shipping box M | Recycled corrugated | No | FR, BE, DE, ES |
| Void fill | Crumpled kraft paper | No | FR, BE, DE, ES |
Four types, so four declarations, not one. And three countries for the first two, four for the others: producer-responsibility registration is not counted per reference but per reference times country.
| Reference | Point | State | To do |
|---|---|---|---|
| 250 g carton | Varnish, PFAS presence | Unknown | Supplier attestation, food contact |
| Inner pouch | Heavy metals | Under limit, 2024 sheet | Get re-confirmed, sheet over 18 months old |
| Shipping box M | E-commerce empty space | 62% on the typical order | Reduce or change format |
| All | Producer marking | Absent | Add at the next print run |
Only one row is genuinely unknown, and it is the worst one: with no supplier answer on the varnish, the carton's declaration cannot be signed.
Declaration of conformity - Inner pouch, PE / metallised PET
Issued on 14 August 2026 under the responsibility of the company placing this packaging on the market under its own brand.
| ItemItem | ContentContent |
|---|---|
| Packaging type | Flexible pouch, direct food contact |
| Declared composition | 60 micron PE, 12 micron metallised PET |
| Function | Primary packaging, dry foodstuff |
| Markets | France, Belgium, Germany |
What it rests on
Supplier technical sheet of March 2026, food contact conformity attestation from the same supplier, and overall migration test report from the laboratory, April 2026.
What it does not cover, and it is better said out loud
The recyclability of the multilayer structure is not declared here. It falls under the 2030 requirements and will be the subject of an addendum. Saying so in the declaration beats letting people assume it is settled.
Technical file
Held and available within ten days on request from a surveillance authority. Version 1, August 2026.
Hello, Further to your request of 14 August regarding the shipment held under reference LOT-2026-0814, here is the documentation. Attached: the declaration of conformity for the inner pouch, the declaration for the carton, and the technical file behind each one, including the supplier sheets and the April 2026 migration report. One item is not attached and I would rather flag it than let you find it: the PFAS-free attestation for the carton varnish was requested from our supplier on 12 August and has not come back. A chase-up went out this morning, and I will forward the document on receipt, by 25 August at the latest. The extended producer responsibility registration number appears at the head of each declaration, for all three member states concerned. I remain reachable on this message for any further item. Compliance manager